Civil unions and registered partnerships. The Boston Globe. The chance to be happy must be accorded to everyone if a wise interpretation of the fundamental law of the land is to be made. Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and mother for a balanced upbringing. No actual cases legalize gay marriage essay date.
Argumentative Essay on Same Sex Marriage
Special offer! Promo code: SAVE For many years now, same-sex marriage has been a controversial topic. While some countries have legalized the practice, others still consider it not right and treat it as illegal. Same-sex marriage is defined as a marriage or union between two people of the same sex, such as a man and a man, legalize gay marriage essay. Some countries have broadened their legalize gay marriage essay on this issue even though for many years, it has never been legally acknowledged, legalize gay marriage essay, with some societies even considering it a taboo.
Irrespective of any arguments, same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right. First, same-sex marriage, if recognized by society, provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care. If people live together in a homosexual relationship without being legally married, they do not enjoy the security to protect what they have worked for and saved together. Legalizing same-sex unions would cushion homosexual partners from such unfortunate situations, legalize gay marriage essay. They would have the right to become heirs to their legalize gay marriage essay and enjoy tax breaks just like heterosexual married couples.
Legalization would also make it possible for them to purchase properties together, open joint accounts, and sign documents together as couples. Same sex marriage also allows two people in love to become one in a matrimonial union and live happily together. Denying homosexual couples the right to marry is thus denying them the right to be in love just like heterosexuals do. Moreover, the definition of marriage does not suggest that it should only be an exclusive union between two people of opposite sexes. According to Gerstmannmarriage is a formally or legally recognized union between two legalize gay marriage essay in a personal relationship, legalize gay marriage essay.
As per this definition, people should be allowed to marry once they are in love with each other irrespective of their genders. Reducing marriage to a union between a man and woman is thus a direct infringement into the rights of homosexuals. Additionally, gay marriages give homosexual couples the right to start families. Just like heterosexual couples, gay and lesbian partners should be allowed to start families and have their own children. Essentially, a family should legalize gay marriage essay have parents and children and it is not necessary that the parents be a male and female.
Same sex partners can easily adopt and bring up children if their marriage is legalized and recognized by the society in which they live Gerstmann, As one would concur, even some heterosexual couples are not able to sire their own children and resort to adopting one or even more. This is a right that should be extended legalize gay marriage essay same sex couples too given that they may not be able to give birth on their own. Further, legalize gay marriage essay, same sex marriage does no harm whatsoever to the institution of marriage, and is potentially more stable, legalize gay marriage essay. This makes it quite uncalled for to argue against or prohibit gay marriages. In yet another study, only 1.
This implies that heterosexual marriages have a slightly higher dissolution rate on average than opposite sex marriages. It legalize gay marriage essay then be argued that gay marriages are more stable than traditional man-woman marriages. The two types of marriages should thus be given equal chance because neither affects the other negatively. They also legalize gay marriage essay more or less equal chances of succeeding if legally recognized and accepted. Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and a mother.
They may say that for children to have a good balance in their upbringing, they should be influenced by a father and a mother in their developmental years. Such arguments hold that homosexual couples only have one gender influence over the lives of children and that this is less fulfilling Badgett, However, the arguments fail to recognize that children under the parental care of same sex couples get to mingle with both male and female genders in various social places. At school, the children get to be cared for and mentored by both male and female teachers who more or less serve almost the same role as parents. Those who are opposed to same sex unions may also argue that such marriages reduce sanctity of marriage.
To them, marriage is a religious and traditional commitment and ceremony that is held very sacred by people. They contend that there is need to do everything possible to preserve marriage because as an institution, legalize gay marriage essay, it has been degrading slowly over time. Their concern is that traditional marriages are being devalued by same sex marriages which are swaying people away from being married and instead choosing to live with same sex partners Nagle, It is clear here that such arguments treat marriage as a man-woman union only and are thus not cognizant of the true meaning of marriage. Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition s or religions.
Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages. It protects the legal rights of lesbian and gay couples and allows them the well-deserved opportunity of actualizing their love in matrimony. In addition, it enables them to exercise their right to start families and bring up children. Arguments made against this form of marriage, such as legalize gay marriage essay it undermines traditional marriages, are based on opinions and not facts. Moreover, legalize gay marriage essay, it is not important for a child to have a father and a mother because there are other places in which they actively interact with people of different sexes.
As such, it is only fair that all governments consider legalizing gay marriages, legalize gay marriage essay. Badgett, M. Patterns of relationship recognition by same-sex couples in the United States [PDF]. The Williams Institute. When gay people get married: what happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage. New York, NY: NYU Press. Gerstmann, E. Same-sex marriage and the constitution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Langbein, L. Same-sex marriage and negative externalities. Social Science Quarterly90 2 Nagle, J.
Same-sex marriage: the debate. New York, NY: The Rosen Publishing Group. Winter, B. Global perspectives on same-sex marriage: a neo-institutional approach. New York, NY: Springer. Same-sex marriage provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care. Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and mother for a balanced upbringing. com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world. Through our website, students can request for help in a diverse range of subjects and disciplines.
We understand that studies are the foundation of success; yet they can be quite a challenge without extra help. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs. Do My Essay! Do not waste time. Get a complete paper today, legalize gay marriage essay. Order essays, research papers, term papers, book reviews, assignments, dissertation, thesis Read more…. Same Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay, with Outline Published by gudwriter on January 4, legalize gay marriage essay, January 4, No Bullshit!! Get A Custom Essay Special offer! Categories: Free Essays and Research Papers. Tags: Examples of Argumentative Essays Free same sex marriage essays.
gudwriter Gudwriter. Related Posts Free Essays and Research Papers Personal Reflection Essay Example Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers The Great Migration Essay Sample Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers Challenges to the Fight against Pollution Globally Do My Essay!
causes of the first world war essay
The commission proposed instead certificates that would guarantee certain rights like hospital visitation, but no financial benefits. The certificates would be available to siblings, parents, and children as well. The commission members who dissented said it spent too much time hearings attacks on the morality of homosexuality. The chairman, Tony Soltani, a Republican member of the state House of Representatives , said; "If we redefined marriage, we'd be tarred and feathered, but if we give them some rights, it will be accepted. Democrats became the majority party in the New Hampshire State Legislature in the general election.
Both Democratic and Republican legislators proposed legislation to grant same-sex couples greater civil rights. The proposals ranged from allowing a couple to enter into a "contractual cohabitation," a "civil union," a "spousal union," or a same-sex marriage. Governor John Lynch opposed same-sex marriage, but indicated that he was receptive to discussing civil unions as a means of granting certain rights to same-sex couples. In early , the Legislature briefly considered a bill authorizing same-sex marriage until Democratic leaders assigned it to a study committee. Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan said, "As far as we're concerned, everything is on schedule.
The first civil unions were formed throughout New Hampshire just after midnight on January 1, The largest gathering occurred on the steps of the State House in Concord. An estimated 40 couples participated as friends, family and onlookers observed. The event drew one protester who "quietly handed out a statement calling all sex outside of heterosexual marriage a sin". Under the New Hampshire civil unions law, same-sex civil unions or marriages conducted in other jurisdictions were recognized as civil unions in New Hampshire. At the end of , after the law had been in effect for one year, approximately civil union licenses had been issued by the state, while approximately 8, marriage licenses were issued by the state during the same period.
Though the civil union law intended to provide "all the rights and obligations and responsibilities provided for in state law that apply to parties who are joined together," [24] they actually entailed a more limited set of benefits and limitations. In , New Hampshire modified its statutes to make same-sex marriages invalid. On March 18, , the New Hampshire House of Representatives Judiciary Committee sent a same-sex marriage bill, HB , to the floor of the House without a recommendation following a tied vote. Governor John Lynch had yet to take a position on the legislation [34] [35] and had five days to exercise his veto. Couples who had entered into civil unions would be able to apply for a marriage license, however if they did not apply for a marriage certificate their civil unions would automatically be converted to marriages on January 1, On May 14, Lynch, though personally opposed to same-sex marriages, said he would sign the bill provided it contained increased protections for churches against lawsuits if they refuse to marry same-sex couples.
The new definition of marriage in New Hampshire became: [47]. Marriage is the legally recognized union of 2 people. Any person who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of this chapter may marry any other eligible person regardless of gender. By the spring of , 1, same-sex couples had married in the state. From to , approximately 2, same-sex couples wed in New Hampshire. From January 1, , no new civil unions were established in the state. Additionally, such persons in civil unions before January 1, were able to record their civil unions with the town or city clerk who recorded the civil union and receive a marriage license, with no additional fee or solemnization required.
A civil union entered into before January 1, , that had not been dissolved, annulled, or transformed into a marriage, was converted to a marriage on January 1, In , the Legislature considered two repeal proposals, a bill to repeal both the same-sex marriage law and the state's civil union law and a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. On October 25, , the House Judiciary Committee voted for a bill repealing same-sex marriage and establishing civil unions far more limited than the state's earlier civil unions. The new civil unions would not be covered by the state's anti-discrimination law and no one would be required to recognize them as the equivalent of opposite-sex marriages.
The bill's effect on same-sex marriages already performed in the state was disputed. The Nashua Telegraph termed the failure of the repeal effort in March "a shocking setback". The House defeated a series of attempts to modify the bill to attract moderate support by providing same-sex couples with an alternative to marriage. Bates' own amendment to delay the bill's effective date until March 31 so a non-binding referendum on the issue of same-sex marriage could be held in November failed on a vote of , [48] with 96 of the chamber's Republicans voting against the referendum. If we feel the need to go to our constituents and ask them a question, we are clearly in trouble.
Democrat Maggie Hassan , a supporter of same-sex marriage, ran against the Legislature's record and won election as governor in November , [63] and Democrats took control of the House. For several years following the legalization of same-sex marriage in New Hampshire, the state's Uniform Marriage Recognition Law invalidated any marriage contracted in New Hampshire by non-residents if their intended state of residence would not recognize the validity of the marriage if contracted within its own jurisdiction. It established that same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions are recognized by New Hampshire as valid from the date they were contracted, even if they pre-dated New Hampshire's recognition of same-sex marriage; that New Hampshire recognizes the same-sex marriages of non-residents whether or not their home jurisdiction recognizes the marriage; and allows those in civil unions in other jurisdictions to marry in New Hampshire without first dissolving their civil union.
In May , the New Hampshire General Court passed a bill to implement a clear minimum age of 16 with no exceptions. This bill also allows same-sex couples to get married at 16; the minimum age for same-sex couples was previously Originally, the bill had a minimum age of 18 for all couples, but it was reduced to 16 in committee. A University of California, Los Angeles UCLA study from March estimates the impact of allowing same-sex couples to marry on New Hampshire's state budget. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Part of the LGBT rights series Legal status of same-sex unions. Civil unions and registered partnerships. Andorra Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Estonia Greece Hungary Italy Liechtenstein.
Common-law marriage. Israel 6. Minimal recognition. See also. Same-sex union legislation Same-sex union court cases Timeline of same-sex marriage Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania Marriage privatization Divorce of same-sex couples Domestic partnership Military policy Adoption Listings by country LGBT rights by country or territory. Performed statewide in 23 states and Mexico City , in certain municipalities in two other states, and recognized by all states in such cases. Performed in the Netherlands proper, including the Caribbean Netherlands.
Registered in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed. Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands. Not recognized in Caribbean overseas territories , though marriage-equivalent ordered for the Cayman Islands. Neither performed nor recognized in American Samoa or some tribal nations. Registered foreign marriages confer limited rights. Marriage recognized in some cities. Degree of recognition unknown. No actual cases to date. The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens.
Legal guardianships nationwide, except Hong Kong and Macau , residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents Hong Kong. Unregistered cohabitation or Maitri Karar —type contractual relationships. Some cities and prefectures issue certificates for same-sex couples, but they are not legally binding. Foreign same-sex spouses are eligible for a "Non-Tourist Visa" as a dependent. LGBT portal. Panel Would Bar Gays from Marrying". Boston Globe. Retrieved August 13, gay marriage commission faces obstacles to finish report". Bangor Daily News. March 5, Gay unions could gain support Concord Monitor.
Accessed April 11, April 5, N. House passes civil unions Concord Monitor. New York Times. Retrieved July 14, April 26, State Senate approves civil unions for same-sex couples Concord Monitor. Accessed April 26, November 25, State House Dome: Date set for civil union licenses New Hampshire Union Leader. Accessed November 25, Besides, gays honor and abide by the laws of the land just like other people in the society. The ability of gays to promote peace and self-reliance is noticeable and there is no reason that they could not perform the basic responsibilities to build a family. Moreover, there are countries outside the United States that legalized same-sex marriage for the reason that gays should be given equal rights as human beings. In the year , Denmark legalized same-sex marriage while Israel did the same the next year Mathews 1.
In the year , Sweden followed suit Mathews 1. There is also an intensified debate about same sex unions in the United States for the past three years. Pro-gay advocates exist within the United States and it was their position that gay marriage should be allowed so as not to commit miscarriage of civil liberties Mathews 1. The disadvantage of preventing gay marriage to happen includes heartbreaking situations like disallowance to visit one another during illness and emergency situations. Gay marriage should be legalized so that a gay partner can have the same right in terms of adoption and medical rights. Adoption is the primary option given by gays with respect to their inability to procreate children Johnson 1.
Adoption is basically given as a right to married couples who want to expand the membership of their families. Since the absence of same sex marriage disallows gays to adopt a child, it would be a difficult situation for them to be denied a chance to care and love adopted children Crumley 1. We are aware that gays are also capable of nurturing children and the fact that there are gays who chose to marry a girl, taking care of an offspring is normal for them Belge 2. So then, is it not selfish to allow gays to adopt children and be legally married to their loved ones? I know that it is our responsibility to ponder on these things and support the legalization of gay marriage.
If not, we will surely fall prey to ignorance and negligence as we continue limit our understanding on what has been considered as usual and normal activities in the community where we live. Furthermore, the United States is the land of the free. It is a mockery to the spirit of the Constitution when limits to the right to marry would be continuously followed. The chance to be happy must be accorded to everyone if a wise interpretation of the fundamental law of the land is to be made. An option to marry and be a permanent partner to a gay individual must be accorded to everyone no matter what the gender may be. It is useless to preach on equality and unconditional love when its expression is limited only to the majority.
How about the gay couples? They are not male and females who entered into a wonderful relationship but they too knows how to love unconditionally. The redefinition of marriage is relevant nowadays Stewart 1. Is it not a problem that there are many families that are considered dysfunctional? These families have parents that male or female and children that are procreated by them. Why not give chances to gays who can adopt and care for a child? It is just a matter of open-mindedness and tolerance, after all the basic purpose of living life is to find happiness hence, the pursuit for happiness.
The family as a basic unit of society must include gay couples since we live in the land of the free. The essence of living freely is not finding anyone unable to express love and devotion to a marital partner despite the absence of damage or injury to other people. If freedom and liberty is too expensive, then how can we afford to live in a democratic country? Well, gay marriage must be legalized for all we know it could be an ingredient for a progressive and peaceful country. In addition, religion and the churches should not interfere with the government with respect to options in legalizing gay marriage. It is usual that when gay marriage is a topic, legal concerns would come into the surface. However, we should realize that religious concerns also affect the choice of legalizing gay marriages Mags 1.
While it is true that the three major religions in the world involving Islam, Judaism and Christianity have been opposed to same sex union, it is also acceptable a present time that many religious people no longer follow the traditional beliefs against same sex marriage. It is a surprise that the Jews, as well as some Christian nations support gay marriage Mags 1. In essence, the traditional religious views on same sex union are becoming weaker as more people opened their eyes to the advantages of gay marriage Mags 1. Therefore, religious views against same sex marriage no longer holds true today for people who think twice about the necessity of gay marriage.
According to proponents of same sex marriage, they already debunked the scriptural arguments on marriage such that they believe that it was misunderstood and taken out of context. It is acceptable that gays should be given the right to get married with another gay and at the same time prevent overpopulation as they cannot bear children. With that, twin matters are met, the promotion of equality and the avoidance of overpopulation. The move to promote conceptive measures rendered nugatory and useless the belief that families should multiply here on earth. The Opposition on Gay Marriage However, there are opponents of gay marriage who provided strong arguments regarding the promiscuousness of same sex union. The primary reason why gay marriage is not acceptable is religious belief.
According to Packer, homosexual activity is a serious sin before the eyes of God Packer There is only a man and woman created by God, thus having a gender called gay and lesbian is not acceptable by religious standards. Marriage is designed for procreation which involves having children in the family. How can gay couple have their own children? The answer may be adoption, but the Biblical instruction is to be fruitful and multiply. It is becoming obvious that churches are more involve of issues that come before the legislature and the electorate. The logic behind that is the protection of morality of which Churches believe to be important in religious responsibility. Morality is an issue that has been bombarded by many people since it can destroy their freedom to express feelings and emotions.
In relation to gay marriage, it is immoral to marry a person that belongs to the same sex. In connection, there are issues in the legislature that calls for identification of whether such issue is under ethical standards or morality or on civil rights. Unfortunately, people view same sex marriage as a civil rights issue which churches want to correct, for it was never a civil rights issue but on morality of men. Therefore, it is not right to condemn the right of religious people to tackle issues and defend their side for doctrines and principles they preach and practice. Those forces that undermine the moral fiber of the society are being fought against by religious people.
These forces include the presence of gays and lesbians alike in the society. But since these people are also humans, churches invited them to repent of their wrong behavior and encourage them to change. Gay marriage undermines the social fiber of the society and if it is continued as an advocacy, numerous people would be attracted to its enticing words. What will happen to the youth which is the hope of our country? Their character and morality would bend in favor of immoral acts and standards because we failed to prepare them and mold their character to become better persons. There are also many religious people who supported different groups that opposed issues related to morality and redefinition of marriage.
Gay marriage is one issue wherein many religious people rally behind powerful interest groups just to prevent any gay marriage legalization. This means that many people are also becoming more concerned of the future and make sure that the strength of morality is being assured whatever the situation may be. Religious organizations like Christians, Muslims and the Buddhists play a big role in keeping the sanctity of marriage intact in these days that temptations loom in every corner. Therefore, gay marriage can destroy the sanctity of marriage and must be eliminated in the society.
Again, same sex marriage is not a civil right at all. It is a matter of morality as opposed to negligence of protecting the moral fiber of society. The people should not question the constitutional rights of churches to raise issues and concerns that matters most to their patrons. Remember that it is also the right of religious people to voice out their opinions. It is then the belief of religious organizations and its members who are against gay marriage that defending the sanctity of marriage through working to preserve traditional marriage lies clearly within religious and constitutional prerogatives. Hence, we cannot blame churches why its members tried hard to oppose gay marriage that might destroy the faith that they gave to God.
It is not true that churches condemn the presence of gays and lesbians Zoll 1. Religious people are simply compelled to speak out due to the principles and doctrines that they believed. Aside from that, the move of religious people to oppose same sex marriage should not be interpreted as justification for hatred, intolerance, or abuse of those who believe in homosexuality, either as a group or individually Packer What religious people do not like is gay marriage and not the presence of homosexuals. Hence, these religious individuals do not condemn those who are lesbians and gays but only oppose the activities that might destroy the sacredness of marriage.
The most active religious group that is against same sex marriage is the Catholic Church. The said church considers homosexuality as a sin and a disorder before the sight of God Zoll 1. The Catholic Church has its own share of issues involving presence of gays in the church, but its efforts in correcting the same is evident on its move to change the status quo. It is also argued that the only legitimate employment of the powers of procreation is between husband and wife who have been legally and lawfully married to each other Packer Gay marriage carries with it issues that also offend the doctrines and beliefs of churches like the sacredness of marriage between husband and wife.
The power to bear and have children is given only to husband and wife and it is impossible for gay couples to do so. Therefore, gay marriage is not acceptable before the eyes of God no matter what the gay marriage advocates say. While it is true that no religious organization be compelled to celebrate same sex marriage whenever a state legalizes the same, it is also correct to say that when this happens there would be an eventual destruction of the moral standards that a few people already have Park 1. It is a fact that there are states that already legalized gay marriage. In states where gay marriage is not legalized, gay couples transfer to states where gay marriage is legalized, leaving their families behind, their jobs, their responsibilities and their dreams.
The right to adopt is only given to married husband and wife who can prove that they can rear the adopted child. If gay couple cannot adopt because legal infirmities exists, then it could cause so much pain and frustration on their part. That situation can be prevented if teaching them moral standards would be prioritized. There are also many gays in the United States who are focused on fighting for their rights and they become activists for that matter. It could be better that they stay in their homes to practice good moral standards and work in their offices to achieve economic development instead of fighting for gay marriage that is not right from the beginning.
On the other hand, gay marriage also deprives a child to have a mother and a father. It is the basic need of a child to be loved and cared by parents who are called father and mother.
No comments:
Post a Comment